HIPAA / GDPR compliant infrastructureBusinessDevelopment@DermaDetect.com
Skin health in the palm of your hand

More dermatology capacity. Without more dermatologists.

DermaDetect is an assisted-intelligence platform that connects patients and clinicians — combining guided photo capture, adaptive intake, image analysis and physician-guided review to help routine dermatology cases move faster and route the right patients to specialists. Health systems, payers, dermatology groups and partners deploy it B2B, white label, direct to consumers or through an API, always under clinician oversight.

✓Physician-guided✓Built for integration✓Designed for safe escalation✓Piloted at scale with Maccabi
DERMADETECT · CASE REVIEW
Ready for clinician
Structured intake complete

New dermatology case

1AI-supported differentialHigh fit
2Alternative considerationReview
3Additional considerationReview
Routing support: resolve remotely when clinically appropriate; escalate uncertain, complex or higher-risk cases for in-person dermatology.
400Kdermatology images in the current dataset
150Kreal-world dermatology cases
~90Kunique patients with dermatologist-labeled cases in the training dataset
74data-supported diagnosis in learning model set
The platform

Turn dermatology intake into a structured, review-ready case.

DermaDetect is designed to sit inside the care pathway — not replace the clinician. The goal is to remove repetitive work, surface useful signal and preserve specialist attention for cases that truly need it.

01

Standardize the intake

Collect photographs and dermatologist-inspired history in a consistent format before specialist review begins.

02

Add decision support

Combine image analysis with structured clinical context to generate an AI-assisted differential for physician review.

03

Route with intention

Support remote resolution of appropriate routine cases while escalating uncertainty, out-of-scope cases and cases requiring examination.

Patient facing

Care at their fingertips

  • Guided photo capture
  • Adaptive intake questions
  • Results and a personal medical file
Assisted intelligenceConnects both sides
Clinician facing

Triage, review and manage

  • Patient file summaries
  • Diagnosis recommendations
  • Case-load management
  • Urgency scoring and ranking
AppsiOSAndroidWebDeploys asB2BWhite labelB2CAPI
Workflow

From referral to resolution — without losing clinical oversight.

A workflow built for asynchronous dermatology, specialist triage and integration with existing healthcare systems.

Step 1

Capture

Patient or referring clinician submits images and a structured history.

Step 2

Organize

The platform standardizes case information into a concise review-ready synopsis.

Step 3

Analyze

AI models assess images and context to support a ranked differential.

Step 4

Review

A physician evaluates the case, recommendations and relevant uncertainty.

Step 5

Resolve or escalate

Appropriate cases are managed remotely; others are directed to in-person care.

Step 6

Treatment management

Track the prescribed treatment and follow up over time — useful signal for adherence, response, and future drug utilization patterns.

Architecture

Automate the repeatable work. Keep the clinician at the center.

Each stage of a dermatology case gets better inputs because the stage before it already did the work: image analysis carries the intake context, review starts from an organized synopsis instead of a raw submission, and treatment sits on a structured record. That compounding is the design — and a clinician stays in the decision at every point that matters.

Stage 1

Vision

Submitted photographs are analyzed alongside the structured intake rather than in isolation, so image findings arrive with the history that explains them.

Hands off →Consistent image findings plus case context, captured the same way on every case.
Stage 2

Documentation

Case information is standardized into a concise, review-ready synopsis, so a clinician opens an organized case instead of assembling one out of a submission.

Hands off →A complete, comparable case record — the input both the model and the reviewing clinician need.
Stage 3

Assessment

Image analysis and structured context together support a ranked, AI-assisted differential across 74 supported diagnosis classes, with anything outside the set routed to “other / refer.”

Hands off →A ranked starting point for the clinician, and an early signal for cases that should not be resolved remotely.
Stage 4

Treatment and follow-up

The physician makes the treatment decision. The platform then tracks the prescribed treatment and the response over time, instead of treating the prescription as the end of the case.

Feeds back →Longitudinal adherence and response signal that sharpens triage, protocols and the next case.
Clinicians make the call. DermaDetect does the preparation.The platform is decision support, not a decision. It removes the repeatable work ahead of review — collecting history, organizing the case, ranking the possibilities — and hands a physician a structured case with its uncertainty stated, including the cases it recommends sending to in-person care.
Beyond the model

The parts of this that don’t come from a model.

A stack of AI features is worth having. It isn’t the whole argument. What makes a dermatology pathway safe to run at volume is the data underneath it, the escalation route out of it, the staffing model around it and the numbers an organization can actually verify afterwards.

Data depth

Depth per class, not just a longer list

How many conditions a system names and how much evidence sits behind each one are different claims. All 74 supported DermaDetect classes are backed by thousands of labeled real-world images, drawn from a dataset of 400K images and 150K cases.

See the data foundation →
Published evidence

A peer-reviewed result, not only a product demo

DermaDetect technology was evaluated for common non-cancerous dermatoses in a prospective multi-centre proof-of-concept study published in the European Journal of Dermatology.

Review the evidence →
Uncertainty

An “other / refer” route is part of the label set

Cases that don’t fit a supported class are routed out rather than forced into the nearest available name — the same discipline that keeps suspicious lesions, actinic keratosis and skin cancer screening on the in-person pathway.

Deployment model

Deployed the way your organization works

Health systems, payers and dermatology groups can run DermaDetect for their own clinicians and referral networks, offer it to patients under their own brand, or build it into their products through an API. Clinical decisions always follow their own protocols and oversight.

Staffing

A capacity model, not only a faster case

Well-structured, AI-supported cases can be staffed by a nurse practitioner, PA or GP working under dermatologist-defined protocols — a capacity gain that faster documentation alone does not deliver.

Measurement

Time per case is a pilot endpoint, not a slogan

Time to complete a case, remote resolution rate, escalation rate and cost per completed case are measured against an organization’s current pathway using its own volume — before anyone attaches a percentage to it.

Model a pilot →
The stages above describe DermaDetect’s platform architecture and currently supported scope, not a regulatory indication or cleared claim. Throughput and time-per-case improvements are pilot endpoints to be measured with each organization’s own data. Model accuracy figures are reported separately in the Technology section below.
The technology

What powers the assisted intelligence.

DermaDetect pairs leading open medical AI models with a proprietary layer of dermatologist-labeled data and clinical logic that the market can’t download. As models improve, the engine gets upgraded; the data, labels and clinical logic stay DermaDetect’s.

Open foundation

Leading medical AI models, built to 2026 standards

  • Google MedSigLIP medical vision model
  • Swappable model backbones, so the engine can be upgraded as the field moves
  • PyTorch and modern tooling
+6.6 ptstop-1 accuracy gain from upgrading the model backbone
Proprietary layer

What the market can’t download

178Kdermatologist annotations from ~225K patient requests
74dermatologist-reviewed diagnosis classes, plus an “other / refer” route
93.4%top-3 accuracy on the core 25 conditions, with patient intake fused in
91.8%top-1 accuracy when confident, from a calibrated clinical gate
As AI models improve, we upgrade the engine. Our data, labels and clinical logic stay ours.
The care gateway

Built to protect and guide patients.

Every case passes through a calibrated confidence gate. The model only recommends a diagnosis when the evidence supports it; everything else goes straight to a specialist. Red-flag screening and triage run alongside the classifier.

Input

Patient intake + image

Photos and adaptive intake answers are assessed together, then scored for confidence.

Diagnosis recommended
~87%

of cases receive a ranked diagnosis with a confidence level, awaiting clinician sign-off — with 95% top-3 accuracy.

Refer
13.0%

of cases get no AI diagnosis and are sent to a specialist.

Residual risk
2.2%

of all cases are high-confidence but wrong — and a clinician still reviews every recommendation.

Accuracy figures come from a held-out, per-patient test split; no public datasets were used. Top-1 accuracy on the core 25 conditions is 74.8%. Care-gateway shares reflect the deployed confidence-tier policy, refit in August 2026. More than answers, the gateway protects patients and opens faster access to a clinician and prescription care.
Operational impact

Give routine dermatology a lower-friction pathway.

DermaDetect isn't trying to solve dermatology's hardest cases or replace an in-person scan or biopsy — those stay on the in-person pathway. The value is in volume: moving more of the routine caseload through faster, so more patients get seen and, when a prescription is needed, it reaches them quickly without slowing down care for the patients who need an in-person visit most. Structured, AI-supported cases also open the door to staffing virtual visits with a more efficient clinician — a nurse practitioner, physician assistant or general practitioner — under dermatologist-defined protocols, instead of requiring a dermatologist for every routine case.

✓
Increase specialist throughputReduce time spent collecting history and organizing cases before review.
✓
Staff virtual visits more efficientlyRoute well-structured, lower-acuity cases to an NP, PA or GP working under dermatologist-defined protocols, reserving dermatologist time for cases that need it.
✓
Reduce avoidable visitsUse remote review where clinically appropriate and preserve in-person appointments for cases that need examination.
✓
Make the economics measurableTrack referral volume, remote resolution, escalation, time to complete a case and cost per completed case.

Dermatology capacity calculator

Illustrative planning model — replace assumptions with your organization’s actual data during a pilot.
2K10,00030K
10%50%90%
10%30%70%
$100$250$600
1,500
illustrative specialist visits avoided / year
$375,000
illustrative gross specialty-capacity value before platform fees and implementation costs
Why this matters now

A shrinking supply of dermatologists meets a growing market for capacity.

DermaDetect's business case starts with a structural problem: demand for dermatology is outpacing the number of dermatologists who can see patients, and that gap is the market this platform is built to help close for the organizations that license it.

~60M patients/yrestimated share of the ~85 million Americans treated for a skin condition annually whose case is routine and non-oncologic — roughly 70% of total U.S. skin-disease visit volume
36.5 daysaverage wait for a new-patient dermatology appointment across 15 major U.S. metros in 2025, up from 34.5 days in 2022
Up to 78Kprojected U.S. specialist physician shortfall by 2034, per AAMC workforce projections
~$14–20Bglobal teledermatology market size in 2026, with multiple analyst forecasts projecting roughly 15–20%+ annual growth through the early 2030s
$6.7B → ~$20BU.S. dermatology drug market, 2025 to 2035
Global opportunity
1 in 4 peoplelive with a skin disease worldwide — recognized by the World Health Assembly as a global health priority
$175Bglobal skin care market in 2026
$23.9B → ~$69Bglobal dermatology drug market, 2025 to 2035

DermaDetect isn't built for the hardest cases. That's the point.

DermaDetect doesn't try to solve dermatology's most complex cases or the ones that need an in-person scan or biopsy — actinic keratosis, suspicious lesions and skin cancer screening stay firmly in the "refer" pathway. The value is in the other ~70% of the caseload: the routine, high-volume conditions that make up most of what dermatology actually treats day to day. Getting more of those patients seen — and getting a prescription to them fast when one is needed — is where the capacity gain and the cost savings come from, without pulling attention away from the patients who need an in-person exam most.

Patients

Faster answers, less unnecessary travel

  • Routine cases can be triaged in days instead of waiting 5+ weeks for a first available slot
  • Fewer avoidable in-person visits for conditions that don't require a physical exam
  • Clearer path to the right level of care — remote resolution or escalation to a specialist — rather than a long queue for every case
Doctors & clinics (the licensee)

More completed cases per clinician hour — and a stronger P&L

  • Structured, pre-organized intake cuts the administrative time a clinician spends before they can actually review a case
  • The same dermatologist panel can resolve more referrals without adding headcount, directly increasing billable throughput
  • Reserves in-person appointment slots — a clinic's scarcest, highest-value resource — for the complex and procedural cases that generate the most revenue per visit
The ecosystem

System-wide capacity and cost savings

  • External teledermatology benchmarks show meaningful reductions in avoidable specialist visits and per-referral cost (see Evidence below)
  • Payers gain a lower-cost pathway for routine dermatology without expanding specialist supply
  • Health systems get a measurable, poolable capacity asset they can allocate across sites rather than being capped by any single clinic's headcount
Market-sizing and caseload figures above are built from third-party analyst and published-research estimates (American Academy of Dermatology Burden of Skin Disease report; published visit-diagnosis studies using National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data; Global Burden of Disease 2021, where 25.7% excludes skin cancer and STIs; World Health Assembly resolution WHA78.15; Precedence Research; Euromonitor) describing the overall dermatology market, not DermaDetect-specific results. The ~70% routine-caseload estimate is a range derived from multiple visit-diagnosis studies, not a single precise government figure. DermaDetect-specific throughput and cost impact should be measured during a pilot with each organization's own data.
Data foundation

Built on real-world dermatology data, not a small demonstration set.

The expanded dataset is designed to support common dermatologic presentations at meaningful scale, with thousands of images behind every one of the 74 supported classes, while preserving an “other / refer” pathway for cases that do not fit a supported class.

400Kreal-world dermatology images in the current dataset
74 →clinically distinct diagnosis classes — see per-condition detail and case frequency

Thousands of images per class, built for strong classification accuracy.

Each of the 74 supported classes is backed by thousands of labeled images, not a handful of examples, and DermaDetect’s expanded training approach includes a generic “other” class for diagnoses outside the supported label set. That creates a route for uncertainty and out-of-scope cases rather than forcing every image into a named condition.

Depth per class, not just a longer listThe number of conditions a system lists and the depth of evidence behind each one are different claims. The 74-class set is built on thousands of real-world images per class, not a thin demonstration sample.
Clinical review remains centralThe model supports a physician’s review; it does not independently replace clinical judgment.
Scope is explicitExpanded-dataset breadth is presented separately from production validation and regulatory claims.
Clinical scope

74 diagnosis classes, organized the way a clinician thinks about them.

Select a body region to see its supported diagnoses, grouped by clinical category. A few also include externally published national statistics, clearly cited — click any name for details.

74diagnosis classes supported across the body
Evidence

Clinical credibility should be visible, specific and sourced.

A large real-world healthcare pilot, two peer-reviewed publications, and a current model generation with expanded, calibrated confidence.

Peer-reviewed · European Journal of Dermatology

AI-assisted diagnostic performance for common skin diseases

A prospective multi-centre proof-of-concept study at 3 French centres evaluated DermaDetect technology for common non-cancerous dermatoses, reaching 88% top-3 sensitivity and 90% specificity across 70 patients and 195 photos. The published methods describe models developed from more than 100,000 real medical cases collected through DermaDetect teledermatology systems. The study used an earlier model generation and was co-authored by the company.

View the publication →
27%

of in-person dermatology clinic visits were avoided in a 700-patient Philadelphia store-and-forward teledermatology program.

External benchmark · JAAD / PubMed · not a DermaDetect result
$140

mean cost savings per newly referred patient in a managed-care teledermatology triage model at Zuckerberg San Francisco General.

External benchmark · JAMA Dermatology · not a DermaDetect result
26%

of unique teledermatology patients in a large Mayo Clinic review later required an in-person examination after the initial televisit.

External benchmark · Mayo Clinic experience · not a DermaDetect result
Large healthcare pilot~225K

patient requests with Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel

  • ~178K doctor annotations
  • Real, unfiltered patient care journeys
Peer-reviewed · Dermatology97.4%

full or partial concordance with in-person follow-ups

  • 12,815 Maccabi users
  • 18-month cohort
  • Dermatologist-delivered care
Peer-reviewed · Eur J Dermatol88% / 90%

top-3 sensitivity / specificity

  • Prospective, 3 French centres
  • 70 patients, 195 photos
  • Earlier model; company co-authored
View the publication →
Current generation74

dermatologist-reviewed classes in the new models

  • Calibrated confidence tiers
  • Updated tech stack
  • New clinicians on board
Built for healthcare organizations

One platform. Different operational value for each buyer.

DermaDetect can be positioned around the outcome each organization actually buys: capacity, lower cost, access, throughput and measurable routing performance.

Health systems

Reduce specialist bottlenecks

  • Virtual-first pathway for selected routine referrals
  • Prioritize complex and procedure-dependent cases
  • Measure resolution, escalation and time-to-review
  • Integrate with existing digital workflows
Payers

Move routine care to a lower-cost pathway

  • Expand member access without adding specialist supply
  • Model cost per dermatology case and visit avoidance
  • Reduce downstream delays caused by long wait times
  • Define economic endpoints before pilot launch
Dermatology groups

Make specialist time more productive

  • Review structured cases instead of raw submissions
  • Use AI-assisted differentials as decision support
  • Manage selected follow-up remotely
  • Reserve office capacity for patients who need it most
Applications

Tools for the whole system.

The same assisted intelligence that supports clinicians can extend to skin care, everyday wellness and real-world evidence for treatments.

Piloted at scale

Doctors

Triage, decision support and prescription pathways.

Clinical use has been piloted at scale. Other environments and care tracking are opportunities, subject to regulatory review.
Team

Built by operators, clinicians, and AI healthcare veterans.

The people behind DermaDetect's platform, clinical validation, and commercial strategy.

Scott Sheps

Scott Sheps

CEO

Background in finance and technology operations: 8 years in public accounting, 5 years in travel tech (FinOps and platform development), and 5 years managing family office operating companies. Led DermaDetect's diligence and modernization with health tech and AI experts.

LinkedIn ↗
Dave DeCaprio

Dave DeCaprio

CTO

20+ years in AI and healthcare. Started on the Human Genome Project at MIT, then moved into pharma and population health. Founded ClosedLoop.ai in 2017, which won the $1.6 million AI Health Outcomes Challenge sponsored by CMS.

LinkedIn ↗
Dr. Brian Lester

Dr. Brian Lester

Medical Advisory Board

Board-certified dermatologist (American Board of Dermatology) with 25 years in medical, surgical and cosmetic dermatology. Yale School of Medicine graduate; completed residency at Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital as Chief Resident. Past Board of Directors member of SkinPAC (AAD's political action committee) and the Massachusetts Academy of Dermatology; past member of the AAD Delegation to the American Medical Association.

Dr. Josh Arbesman

Dr. Josh Arbesman

Medical Advisory Board

Board-certified dermatologist at Cleveland Clinic, conducting clinical and basic-science research in melanoma genetics and melanoma drug development. Trained at the University at Buffalo School of Medicine, completed dermatology residency at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, and a postdoctoral fellowship in Molecular and Investigative Dermatology at Case Western Reserve University. Member of the American Academy of Dermatology.

LinkedIn ↗

What would 20% more usable dermatology capacity mean to your system?

Start with your referral volume, average wait time, cost per specialist visit and current triage pathway. We’ll model a pilot around measurable clinical and economic endpoints.

Explore a pilot →